- Moved all documentation to docs/ and updated README with categorized links and new docs/INDEX.md - Added HOW_TO_SWITCH_DATABASE.md and several new analysis/action docs - Introduced db-config.ps1 for centralized DB config; all scripts now use it for easy DB switching - Added db-quick.ps1 for interactive diagnostics and index management - Updated Add-All-Indexes.bat to use db-config.ps1 - Added Fix-ItemValues-Performance.ps1 to create 3 critical indexes on ItemValues, addressing 1.3B row seq scan issue - Updated performance_indexes.sql with new ItemValues indexes and ANALYZE - Updated diagnostics.sql and database_report.txt for improved output and clarity - All scripts and docs now reference the new config and index optimization workflow
5.2 KiB
⚡ Quick Action Plan - Based on Your Diagnostics
🎯 What Your Diagnostics Revealed
✅ Good:
- No errors, no locks, no blocking
- Most tables have excellent index usage (94-99%)
- Supplementary indexes installed correctly
⚠️ Issues:
- ItemValues table: 1.3 BILLION rows read via sequential scans! 😱
- Peoples table: 918 million rows read
- Supplementary indexes: Almost unused (0-10 uses)
🚀 What To Do Now
Step 1: Use Jellyfin Normally (This Week) ⭐
The supplementary indexes we created target specific user interactions. You need to actually use Jellyfin to see if they help!
Do these actions:
Browse Recently Added
Dashboard → Recently Added
Tests: idx_baseitems_datecreated_filtered
Filter by Genre/Tags
Movies → Filter → Genre → Action
TV Shows → Filter → Tags → Drama
Tests: idx_itemvaluesmap_itemvalueid_itemid
Browse Libraries
Movies → Browse folders
TV Shows → Navigate seasons
Tests: idx_baseitems_type_isvirtualitem_topparentid
Step 2: Run Diagnostics Again (End of Week)
& "C:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\18\bin\psql.exe" -U jellyfin -d jellyfin -f sql\diagnostics.sql > diagnostics_week1.txt
Compare to today's results:
- Are supplementary indexes being used more?
- Has ItemValues improved?
Step 3: Optimize ItemValues Table (Next Week)
After we see actual usage patterns, create targeted indexes for ItemValues.
📊 Why Supplementary Indexes Show 0 Uses
Your diagnostics show:
- 0 active database connections
- 0 long-running queries
- Index usage from past activity only
This means:
- Database has been idle
- Indexes only get used when queries run
- Need to use Jellyfin to generate workload
It's like installing a highway but nobody's driven on it yet! 🛣️
🔧 I Already Fixed One Thing
✅ Updated Statistics - Ran ANALYZE so PostgreSQL knows about the new indexes
📅 1-Week Testing Plan
| Day | Action | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
| Day 1-2 | Use Jellyfin normally - Browse libraries - Filter by genre - View Recently Added |
Generate query workload |
| Day 3 | Run diagnosticssql\diagnostics.sql |
See if indexes are used |
| Day 4-7 | Continue using Jellyfin | Build more usage data |
| Day 7 | Run diagnostics again Compare to today |
Decide which indexes to keep |
🎯 Success Metrics
After 1 week, you should see:
If Indexes Are Working:
idx_baseitems_datecreated_filtered: 100+ usesidx_itemvaluesmap_itemvalueid_itemid: 50+ uses- ItemValues seq scans: Reduced from 226k
If Indexes Aren't Helping:
- Still 0-10 uses after heavy use
- Action: Remove unused indexes to save space
- Create different indexes based on actual query patterns
🔥 The Real Problem: ItemValues Table
Your diagnostics show the biggest issue isn't what we optimized:
ItemValues Table:
- 226,121 sequential scans
- 1.3 BILLION rows read
- Only 52% index usage
- This is killing performance! 😱
Why Our Indexes Didn't Help: We created indexes for:
- BaseItems (recently added, virtual items, folders)
- ItemValuesMap (genre/tag mapping)
- ActivityLogs (user activity)
But NOT for ItemValues itself!
Next Step: After seeing usage patterns, we'll create indexes specifically for ItemValues table.
🎓 What This Teaches Us
Index Creation Is Iterative:
- Phase 1: Create indexes based on schema analysis ✅ (Done)
- Phase 2: Test with real workload ← You are here
- Phase 3: Monitor what's used, remove what's not
- Phase 4: Create indexes for actual bottlenecks
- Phase 5: Repeat
You can't optimize until you have real data!
⚠️ Don't Panic About Low Usage
It's normal! Here's why:
- Database was idle - 0 connections when you ran diagnostics
- New indexes - Just created, haven't had time to prove themselves
- Need workload - Indexes only matter when queries run
Analogy: You installed a fire extinguisher. The fact it hasn't been used yet doesn't mean it's useless! 🧯
🚦 Quick Status Check
✅ Done:
- Supplementary indexes created
- Statistics updated
- Diagnostics analyzed
📋 To Do:
- Use Jellyfin normally this week
- Run diagnostics end of week
- Compare results
- Optimize ItemValues table
- Remove unused indexes after 30 days
💡 Pro Tip: Keep a Log
Create a simple log of your Jellyfin usage:
Day 1:
- Browsed Movies library (5 min)
- Filtered by Action genre (10 items viewed)
- Viewed Recently Added (scrolled through 20 items)
Day 2:
- Searched for actor "Tom Hanks" (15 results)
- Watched a movie
- Browsed TV Shows (10 min)
This helps correlate index usage with your actions!
🎉 Bottom Line
Your database is healthy! The issues are optimization opportunities, not critical errors.
Action Items:
- ✅ Statistics updated (done by me)
- Use Jellyfin normally for 1 week (your task)
- Run diagnostics next week (we'll do together)
- Optimize based on real data (next phase)
Keep calm and keep testing! 🚀
See DATABASE_ANALYSIS_REPORT.md for the complete technical analysis.